[pve-devel] ZFS alternatives

Gilberto Nunes gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com
Sat Feb 24 13:40:41 CET 2018


Ceph is wonderful, but isn't in discussion in this thread.

---
Gilberto Nunes Ferreira

(47) 3025-5907
(47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram

Skype: gilberto.nunes36




2018-02-24 9:35 GMT-03:00 Søren Laursen <sln at fcoo.dk>:

> What about CEPH.
>
> Pro and cons?
>
> Søren
>
>
> ________________________________________
> Fra: pve-devel [pve-devel-bounces at pve.proxmox.com] på vegne af
> Gandalf Corvotempesta [gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com]
> Sendt: 23. februar 2018 19:11
> Til: PVE development discussion
> Emne: Re: [pve-devel] ZFS alternatives
>
> Il 23 feb 2018 2:50 PM, "Andreas Steinel" <a.steinel at gmail.com> ha
> scritto:
>
> ext4 and md is inferior in every aspect except memory usage, but ZFS
> was and is an enterprise file system.
>
>
> MD is way more flexible than zfs
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
> https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
> https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>



More information about the pve-devel mailing list