[pve-devel] applied: [PATCH docs 1/3] Document that active-backup is recommended for corosync

Fabian Gr├╝nbichler f.gruenbichler at proxmox.com
Mon Oct 9 10:02:10 CEST 2017


On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 03:55:14PM +0200, Emmanuel Kasper wrote:
> ---
>  pve-network.adoc | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/pve-network.adoc b/pve-network.adoc
> index 315ba63..dd86029 100644
> --- a/pve-network.adoc
> +++ b/pve-network.adoc
> @@ -246,8 +246,13 @@ slaves in the single logical bonded interface such that different
>  network-peers use different MAC addresses for their network packet
>  traffic.
>  
> -For the most setups the active-backup are the best choice or if your
> -switch support LACP "IEEE 802.3ad" this mode should be preferred.
> +If your switch support the LACP (IEEE 802.3ad) protocol then we recommend using
> +the corresponding bonding mode (802.3ad). Otherwise you should generally use the 
> +active-backup mode. +
> +// http://lists.linux-ha.org/pipermail/linux-ha/2013-January/046295.html
> +If you intend to run your cluster network on the bonding interfaces, then you
> +have to use active-passive mode on the bonding interfaces, other modes are
> +unsupported.
>  
>  The following bond configuration can be used as distributed/shared
>  storage network. The benefit would be that you get more speed and the
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
> https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel



More information about the pve-devel mailing list