[pve-devel] [PATCH] [FIX] Fix snapshot logic and enable lvmthin storage type.
Stefan Priebe
s.priebe at profihost.ag
Thu Jan 21 19:31:34 CET 2016
Am 21.01.2016 um 19:28 schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER:
>>> I am also thinking about btrfs as alternative?
>
> I never had used it in production, but I think it should be enough stable.
at least for our backup storage 3x 50TB it works good since Kernel 4.4.
Before it had too many bugs and still nobody backports all stuff to
stable kernels.
Currently we run 4.1 + 350 btrfs patches on top up to vanilla 4.5 rc
patches.
Greets,
Stefan
>
>
> (BTW, btrs don't support swap currently, don't known how it's work if you manage raid volumes with it)
>
>
>
>
> ----- Mail original -----
> De: "dietmar" <dietmar at proxmox.com>
> À: "aderumier" <aderumier at odiso.com>, "pve-devel" <pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com>
> Cc: "Fabian Grünbichler" <f.gruenbichler at proxmox.com>
> Envoyé: Jeudi 21 Janvier 2016 11:41:18
> Objet: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] [FIX] Fix snapshot logic and enable lvmthin storage type.
>
>> It could be a good alternative to zfs (which can be too much memory hungry for
>> small configs).
>>
>> I think it could be great to add support for lvm raid management
>> https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Logical_Volume_Manager_Administration/raid_volumes.html
>
> I am also thinking about btrfs as alternative?
>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>
More information about the pve-devel
mailing list