[pve-devel] iothread

Michael Rasmussen mir at datanom.net
Fri Aug 19 07:57:14 CEST 2016


On Fri, 19 Aug 2016 07:53:27 +0200
Michael Rasmussen <mir at datanom.net> wrote:

> I see a usecase for high iops requirement and especially when storage
> is ceph but for enterprise and/or HA usage in generel it is a disaster
> waiting to happen if moving a disk between storage pools is not
> supported and taking backup is not allowed.
>  
All this summed up: As long as these issues exists I think users should
be strongly warned against iothread and that using the feature should
be classified as a technology preview.

-- 
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen

Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C
mir <at> miras <dot> org
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917
--------------------------------------------------------------
/usr/games/fortune -es says:
Ego sum ens omnipotens.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/attachments/20160819/6c1417e2/attachment.sig>


More information about the pve-devel mailing list