[pve-devel] [PATCH 2/7] hv_spinlocks : use 0x1fff instead 0xffff
Alexandre Derumier
aderumier at odiso.com
Mon Mar 16 05:57:42 CET 2015
redhat use 0x1fff (8191) vs 0xffff (65535)
This is the number of retries of spinlocks
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Derumier <aderumier at odiso.com>
---
PVE/QemuServer.pm | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/PVE/QemuServer.pm b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
index db8572b..6f0586b 100644
--- a/PVE/QemuServer.pm
+++ b/PVE/QemuServer.pm
@@ -2866,7 +2866,11 @@ sub config_to_command {
push @$globalFlags, 'kvm-pit.lost_tick_policy=discard';
push @$cmd, '-no-hpet';
#push @$cpuFlags , 'hv_vapic" if !$nokvm; #fixme, my win2008R2 hang at boot with this
- push @$cpuFlags , 'hv_spinlocks=0xffff' if !$nokvm;
+ if (qemu_machine_feature_enabled ($machine_type, $kvmver, 2, 3)) {
+ push @$cpuFlags , 'hv_spinlocks=0x1fff' if !$nokvm;
+ } else {
+ push @$cpuFlags , 'hv_spinlocks=0xffff' if !$nokvm;
+ }
}
if ($ost eq 'win7' || $ost eq 'win8') {
--
1.7.10.4
More information about the pve-devel
mailing list