[pve-devel] [PATCH] tap_plug : add support for vlan aware linux bridge

Alexandre DERUMIER aderumier at odiso.com
Wed Aug 5 07:11:48 CEST 2015


>>Something to be aware of, QinQ does not always have an outer tag with ethertype 0x88a8, it can also have a tag of 0x8100 or 0x9100 depending on the implementation.
ah ok, dindn't known that

echo 0x8100 > /sys/class/net/vmbr1/bridge/vlan_protocol
echo 0x88a8 > /sys/class/net/vmbr1/bridge/vlan_protocol

are implemented currently

but not

# echo 0x9100 > /sys/class/net/vmbr1/bridge/vlan_protocol
  echo: write error: Protocol not supported


Found some info here:
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/LinuxConJapan2015_makita_0_0.pdf

They say indeed that stacked vlans != 802.1ad.
(so 802.1ad is the standard, but it should work with other types of vlan)


----- Mail original -----
De: "Andrew Thrift" <andrew at networklabs.co.nz>
À: "aderumier" <aderumier at odiso.com>
Cc: "pve-devel" <pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com>
Envoyé: Mercredi 5 Août 2015 01:54:02
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] tap_plug : add support for vlan aware linux bridge

Hi Alexandre, 
This looks like it should work. 

Something to be aware of, QinQ does not always have an outer tag with ethertype 0x88a8, it can also have a tag of 0x8100 or 0x9100 depending on the implementation. 

For example: 

0x88a8--0x8100 Outer-tag (SVID) of 0x88a8, Inner-tag (CVID) of 0x8100 
0x8100--0x8100 Outer-tag (SVID) of 0x8100, Inner-tag (CVID) of 0x8100 
0x9100--0x8100 Outer-tag (SVID) of 0x9100, Inner-tag (CVID) of 0x8100 

We typically use "stacked" tags of 0x8100 so both the outer and inner tag are 0x8100, this seems to be the most compatible method and is supported by all vendors that I am aware of. 




On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER < aderumier at odiso.com > wrote: 


This seem to work. 
(I'm not sure about tcpdump result when vlan are stacked) 


auto vmbrcustomer1 
iface vmbrcustomer1 inet manual 
bridge_vlan_aware yes 
bridge_ports customer1lp 
bridge_stp off 
bridge_fd 0 
pre-up ip link add dev customer1l type veth peer name customer1lp 
post-up ip link set customer1l up 


auto vmbr0 
iface vmbr0 inet manual 
bridge_vlan_aware yes 
bridge_ports eth0 customer1l 
bridge_stp off 
bridge_fd 0 
post-up echo 0x88a8 > /sys/class/net/vmbr0/bridge/vlan_protocol 
post-up bridge vlan add dev customer1l vid 10 pvid untagged 


----- Mail original ----- 
De: "aderumier" < aderumier at odiso.com > 
À: "Andrew Thrift" < andrew at networklabs.co.nz > 
Cc: "pve-devel" < pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com > 
Envoyé: Mardi 4 Août 2015 14:02:46 
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] tap_plug : add support for vlan aware linux bridge 

Another way, 

but I'm not sure it's working, is to tag 802.1ad on the physical interface 




eth0.10---->vmbrcustomer<--(vlanX)------tapX 



auto vmbrcustomer1 
iface vmbrcustomer1 inet manual 
bridge_vlan_aware yes 
bridge_ports eth0.10 
bridge_stp off 
bridge_fd 0 
pre-up ip link add link eth0 eth0.10 type vlan proto 802.1ad id 10 




----- Mail original ----- 
De: "aderumier" < aderumier at odiso.com > 
À: "Andrew Thrift" < andrew at networklabs.co.nz > 
Cc: "pve-devel" < pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com > 
Envoyé: Mardi 4 Août 2015 12:22:47 
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] tap_plug : add support for vlan aware linux bridge 

>>Hi Alexandre, 
Hi, 

>>We also use QinQ and have submitted patches for the previous network implementation that made use of a "bridge in bridge" design to achieve the QinQ functionality. 

They are also a new way to implement q-in-q with vlan aware bridge 

http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ethernet-bridging/msg05514.html 

+----+ +-------+p/u +------+ +----+ +--+ 
|eth0|--|802.1ad|----veth----|802.1Q|--|vnet|--|VM| 
+----+ |bridge | |bridge| +----+ +--+ 
+-------+ +------+ 

p/u: pvid/untagged 



Currently we have implemented 802.1Q bridge. 

for qinq, we need to create a root bridge, with 802.1ad enabled, linked through a veth pair to 802.1Q bridge. 


The qinq bridge is managed exactly in the same way than 802.1ad, but it's enabled with 
echo 0x88a8 > /sys/class/net/XXX/bridge/vlan_protocol 

for example 
------------ 
eth0----vmbr0--(vlan10)<---brigelink-------bridgelinkpeer---->vmbrcustomer<--(vlanX)------tapX 


brctl addbr vmbr0 
echo 0x88a8 > /sys/class/net/vmbr0/bridge/vlan_protocol 
ip link add dev bridgelink type veth peer name bridgelinkpeer 
brctl addif vmbr0 bridgelink 
brctl addif vmbrcustomer1 bridgelinkpeer 
bridge vlan add dev bridgelink vid 10 pvid untagged 


something like that 


I can try to make a patch, but I don't have hardware which support q-in-q for testing. 




----- Mail original ----- 
De: "Andrew Thrift" < andrew at networklabs.co.nz > 
À: "aderumier" < aderumier at odiso.com > 
Cc: "pve-devel" < pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com > 
Envoyé: Mardi 4 Août 2015 10:49:26 
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] tap_plug : add support for vlan aware linux bridge 

Hi Alexandre, 
We also use QinQ and have submitted patches for the previous network implementation that made use of a "bridge in bridge" design to achieve the QinQ functionality. 

The new vlan aware bridge implementation will be a lot cleaner. 

When your patches are ready we will test them and provide feedback. 


Thanks, 



Andrew 

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:09 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER < aderumier at odiso.com > wrote: 


does somebody have tested my vlan bridges patches ? (note that that need iproute2 from debian sid, for vlan ranges) 

It's working really fine here, I'm looking to add a patch for Q-in-Q bridge too. (I think Stefan Priebe use them) 





----- Mail original ----- 
De: "aderumier" < aderumier at odiso.com > 
À: "Wolfgang Bumiller" < w.bumiller at proxmox.com > 
Cc: "pve-devel" < pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com > 
Envoyé: Vendredi 24 Juillet 2015 18:49:18 
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] tap_plug : add support for vlan aware linux bridge 

>>Why is `bridge_add_interface` now restricted to the firewall-else 
>>branch? 

I manage it like openvswitch, 

vlan tagging is always done on the main bridge, not firewall bridge. 


> + if ($firewall) { 
> + &$create_firewall_bridge_linux($iface, $bridge, $tag); 

create_firewall_bridge_linux($iface, $bridge, $tag) 
have 

- &$bridge_add_interface($bridge, $vethfwpeer); 
+ &$bridge_add_interface($bridge, $vethfwpeer, $tag); #tag on the main bridge 
- return $fwbr; 
+ &$bridge_add_interface($fwbr, $iface); # add vm tap interface on fwbridge without vlan tag 









----- Mail original ----- 
De: "Wolfgang Bumiller" < w.bumiller at proxmox.com > 
À: "aderumier" < aderumier at odiso.com > 
Cc: "pve-devel" < pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com > 
Envoyé: Vendredi 24 Juillet 2015 15:20:06 
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] tap_plug : add support for vlan aware linux bridge 

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 01:52:59PM +0200, Alexandre Derumier wrote: 
> - $newbridge = &$create_firewall_bridge_linux($iface, $newbridge) if $firewall; 
> + if (!$vlan_aware) { 
> + my $newbridge = activate_bridge_vlan($bridge, $tag); 
> + copy_bridge_config($bridge, $newbridge) if $bridge ne $newbridge; 
> + $tag = undef; 
> + } 
> + 
> + if ($firewall) { 
> + &$create_firewall_bridge_linux($iface, $bridge, $tag); 
> + } else { 
> + &$bridge_add_interface($bridge, $iface, $tag); 
> + } 
> 
> - &$bridge_add_interface($newbridge, $iface); 


Why is `bridge_add_interface` now restricted to the firewall-else 
branch? 
_______________________________________________ 
pve-devel mailing list 
pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com 
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel 

_______________________________________________ 
pve-devel mailing list 
pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com 
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel 



_______________________________________________ 
pve-devel mailing list 
pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com 
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel 
_______________________________________________ 
pve-devel mailing list 
pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com 
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel 







More information about the pve-devel mailing list