[pve-devel] can't add fwpr2004p0 to bridge vmbr0: Unknown error 524
Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
s.priebe at profihost.ag
Mon Jun 16 13:45:15 CEST 2014
Am 16.06.2014 11:49, schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER:
>>> I think this should get cleaned in that case?
>
> currently the cleanup is done:
>
> at vm shutdown
> at vm start
> when you disable|enable firewall on netX through api
>
> but indeed we can improve that (I'll try to have a look at it)
>
>
>>> I just don't get why it works for vmbr1 but not for vmbr0.
>
> can you try to manually add
>
> #brctl addif fwln2004i0 fwbr2004i0
> #brctl addif fwpr2004p0 vmbr0
>
> ?
OK i think i got it. I'm using the netconsole device to log all kernel
messages and also pre boot messages to a custom server.
It seems the netconsole driver breaks this. I'll have a look at it.
Stefan
> ----- Mail original -----
>
> De: "Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG" <s.priebe at profihost.ag>
> À: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com>
> Cc: pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
> Envoyé: Lundi 16 Juin 2014 11:40:59
> Objet: Re: [pve-devel] can't add fwpr2004p0 to bridge vmbr0: Unknown error 524
>
> Am 16.06.2014 11:37, schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER:
>>>> What is the difference between the normal tap device without firewall -
>>>> which works fine for me on vmbr0 and vmbr1 and the firewall tap one?
>>
>> They are not difference.
>>
>> we just need a dedicated bridge (fwbrxxx) by firewalled tap interface,
>> and this bridge is plugged to vmbrX through a veth pair( fwprxxxx)
>
> I just don't get why it works for vmbr1 but not for vmbr0.
>
> I don't see a difference.
>
> Generally if adding the bridge fails for whatever reason there is a lot
> of unremoved stuff:
>
> [: ~]# ip a l | grep fwbr
> 14: fwbr2004i0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
> state UP
> 16: fwln2004i0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
> pfifo_fast master fwbr2004i0 state UP qlen 1000
>
> [: ~]# ifconfig| grep ^fw
> fwbr2004i0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr d2:74:33:d9:50:92
> fwln2004i0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr d2:74:33:d9:50:92
> fwpr2004p0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr b2:47:35:28:2c:de
>
> I think this should get cleaned in that case?
>
> Stefan
>
>>
>> ----- Mail original -----
>>
>> De: "Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG" <s.priebe at profihost.ag>
>> À: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com>
>> Cc: pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
>> Envoyé: Lundi 16 Juin 2014 11:29:00
>> Objet: Re: [pve-devel] can't add fwpr2004p0 to bridge vmbr0: Unknown error 524
>>
>> What is the difference between the normal tap device without firewall -
>> which works fine for me on vmbr0 and vmbr1 and the firewall tap one?
>>
>> Stefan
>> Am 16.06.2014 11:10, schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> i get the same problem with the official redhat PVE Kernel.
>>>
>>> What i don't understand is that it works fine with vmbr1 but not with
>>> vmbr0.
>>>
>>> Interfaces file on host:
>>>
>>> auto vmbr0
>>> iface vmbr0 inet static
>>> address XX.XX.XX.XX
>>> netmask 255.255.255.128
>>> gateway XX.XX.XX.XX
>>> bridge_ports bond0
>>> bridge_stp off
>>> bridge_fd 0
>>>
>>> auto vmbr1
>>> iface vmbr1 inet manual
>>> bridge_ports bond1
>>> bridge_stp off
>>> bridge_fd 0
>>>
>>> Stefan
>>>
>>> Am 16.06.2014 09:50, schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER:
>>>>>> Do i need a special kernel feature?
>>>> I don't think.
>>>> It's just create a veth pair, then plug them in bridge.
>>>>
>>>> I check my logs, I don't have theses
>>>>
>>>> "netpoll: (null): fwpr2004p0 doesn't support polling, aborting "
>>>>
>>>> do you use a custom kernel ?
>>>
>>> Stefan
>>>
More information about the pve-devel
mailing list