[pve-devel] firewall : cluster.fw [rules] section ?
Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
s.priebe at profihost.ag
Mon Jul 7 14:26:37 CEST 2014
Am 07.07.2014 13:30, schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER:
>>> I'll check if we couldn't mix iptables and nftables (for the layer2), to not do twice the job.
>
> Seem to works, I have create a simple layer2 filtering with
>
> nft add rule bridge filter forward iifname tap123i0 log prefix \"testdrop\" drop
>
>
> + iptables running in parralel,
>
> and it's works fine.
>
>
>
> some notes:
>
> ethernet protocol filtering can be manage with
>
> # nft add rule bridge filter forward ether type 0x0800
>
>
>
> I have a segfault with mac filtering
> --------------------------------------
>
> # mac source
> add rule bridge filter forward iifname tap123i0 @ll,48,48 00:15:e9:f0:10:f8 counter
> # mac dest
> add rule bridge filter forward iifname tap123i0 @ll,0,48 00:1b:21:02:6f:ad counter
> # mac source and mac dest
> add rule bridge filter forward iifname tap123i0 @ll,0,48 00:1b:21:02:6f:ad @ll,48,48 00:15:e9:f0:10:f8 counter
>
>
>
> Jul 7 13:24:36 kvmtest1 kernel: [ 9213.510642] nft[24469]: segfault at 0 ip 000000000040c647 sp 00007fffb7178620 error 4 in nft[400000+44000]
>
>
> So, maybe it's a bug in current rhel kernel.
> (I'll test with a 3.15 kernel)
segfaulting in nft looks more like a bug in nfs cmd tool. Have you tried
to attach with gdb und the debug libs?
Stefan
> ----- Mail original -----
>
> De: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com>
> À: "Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG" <s.priebe at profihost.ag>
> Cc: "pve-devel" <pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com>
> Envoyé: Lundi 7 Juillet 2014 10:24:13
> Objet: Re: [pve-devel] firewall : cluster.fw [rules] section ?
>
>>> I really would love to see the mac filter for layer2 in the first
>>> release. At least to me it's a pretty important thing. Otherwise the
>>> current mac filter is pretty "useless".
>>>
>>> Stefan
>
> I'll check if we couldn't mix iptables and nftables (for the layer2), to not do twice the job.
>
>
>
> ----- Mail original -----
>
> De: "Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG" <s.priebe at profihost.ag>
> À: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com>, "Dietmar Maurer" <dietmar at proxmox.com>
> Cc: "pve-devel" <pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com>
> Envoyé: Lundi 7 Juillet 2014 09:17:42
> Objet: Re: [pve-devel] firewall : cluster.fw [rules] section ?
>
> Hi,
>
> Am 07.07.2014 07:46, schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER:
>>>> My feeling is that we should use nft, else we will do all work twice.
>>>>
>> yes.
>>
>>>> But the current iptables implementation is a good start for the first release.
>>
>> I'll try to build a nftables rules sample manually to see what's missing.
>> maybe can we release current iptables code for ipv4+ipset and later nftables for ipv4+ipv6+etables ?
>
> I really would love to see the mac filter for layer2 in the first
> release. At least to me it's a pretty important thing. Otherwise the
> current mac filter is pretty "useless".
>
> Stefan
>
>> I think nft it's almost ready, 0.3 release note said that some parts are not yet ready
>> (masquerading, unicast/multicast/broacast rules).
>> So it should be ready in some months I think.
>>
>>
>> "
>> Ongoing works
>> =============
>>
>> There are several open fronts in terms of development:
>>
>> * Full logging support for all the supported families (ip, ip6, arp,
>> bridge and inet).
>>
>> * Masquerading support.
>>
>> * Better reject support, which allows you to indicate the explicit reject
>> reason.
>>
>> * JSON/XML import.
>>
>> * reverse set lookups, eg.
>>
>> ip saddr != { 192.168.0.1, 192.168.0.10, 192.168.0.11 }
>> ^^
>>
>> * more new meta selectors, packet type (unicast, multicast and broadcast),
>> cpu, physical interface, realm, etc.
>>
>> * support for concatenations - multidimensional exact matches in O(1) types
>>
>> * set selection - automatic selection of the optimal set
>> implementation.
>> "
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Mail original -----
>>
>> De: "Dietmar Maurer" <dietmar at proxmox.com>
>> À: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com>
>> Cc: "pve-devel" <pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com>
>> Envoyé: Lundi 7 Juillet 2014 06:02:08
>> Objet: RE: [pve-devel] firewall : cluster.fw [rules] section ?
>>
>>> another interesting feature since nftables 0.2, is to be able to manage ipv4 and
>>> ipv6
>>> in the same filter table
>>
>> My feeling is that we should use nft, else we will do all work twice.
>>
>> But the current iptables implementation is a good start for the first release.
>> _______________________________________________
>> pve-devel mailing list
>> pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
>> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>
More information about the pve-devel
mailing list