[pve-devel] firewall : cluster.fw [rules] section ?

Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG s.priebe at profihost.ag
Mon Jul 7 09:17:42 CEST 2014


Hi,

Am 07.07.2014 07:46, schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER:
>>> My feeling is that we should use nft, else we will do all work twice. 
>>>
> yes. 
> 
>>> But the current iptables implementation is a good start for the first release. 
> 
> I'll try to build a nftables rules sample manually to see what's missing.
> maybe can we release current iptables code for ipv4+ipset   and later nftables for ipv4+ipv6+etables ?

I really would love to see the mac filter for layer2 in the first
release. At least to me it's a pretty important thing. Otherwise the
current mac filter is pretty "useless".

Stefan

> I think nft it's almost ready, 0.3 release note said that some parts are not yet ready
> (masquerading, unicast/multicast/broacast rules).
> So it should be ready in some months I think.
> 
> 
> "
> Ongoing works
> =============
> 
> There are several open fronts in terms of development:
> 
> * Full logging support for all the supported families (ip, ip6, arp,
>   bridge and inet).
> 
> * Masquerading support.
> 
> * Better reject support, which allows you to indicate the explicit reject
>   reason.
> 
> * JSON/XML import.
> 
> * reverse set lookups, eg.
> 
> ip saddr != { 192.168.0.1, 192.168.0.10, 192.168.0.11 }
>          ^^
> 
> * more new meta selectors, packet type (unicast, multicast and broadcast),
>   cpu, physical interface, realm, etc.
> 
> * support for concatenations - multidimensional exact matches in O(1) types
> 
> * set selection - automatic selection of the optimal set
>   implementation.
> "
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Mail original ----- 
> 
> De: "Dietmar Maurer" <dietmar at proxmox.com> 
> À: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com> 
> Cc: "pve-devel" <pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com> 
> Envoyé: Lundi 7 Juillet 2014 06:02:08 
> Objet: RE: [pve-devel] firewall : cluster.fw [rules] section ? 
> 
>> another interesting feature since nftables 0.2, is to be able to manage ipv4 and 
>> ipv6 
>> in the same filter table 
> 
> My feeling is that we should use nft, else we will do all work twice. 
> 
> But the current iptables implementation is a good start for the first release. 
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
> 


More information about the pve-devel mailing list