[pve-devel] [PATCH] openvswitch hybrid network	model	implementation
    Alexandre DERUMIER 
    aderumier at odiso.com
       
    Thu Apr 24 08:52:54 CEST 2014
    
    
  
I have begin small tests on my old server, I reach 7gbit/s
with veth or without veth, with bridge directly or openswitch.  (kernel 3.10 test only)
I'm cpu limited (2small cores), I'll try on a big 64cores server today.
(I have patchs for Network.pm to manage veth-fwbridge, do you want them to test ?)
----- Mail original ----- 
De: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com> 
À: "Dietmar Maurer" <dietmar at proxmox.com> 
Cc: pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com 
Envoyé: Mercredi 23 Avril 2014 13:49:05 
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] openvswitch hybrid network model implementation 
>>Yes. Do you have some time to implement that to test performance? 
yes, no problem. not today, but tomorrow I'll have time. 
I would like also to give some love to openvz veth management. 
Do you known where I can add some code to manage network bridge,ovs,.. ? (like for qemu in Network.pm) 
----- Mail original ----- 
De: "Dietmar Maurer" <dietmar at proxmox.com> 
À: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com> 
Cc: pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com 
Envoyé: Mercredi 23 Avril 2014 10:46:59 
Objet: RE: [pve-devel] [PATCH] openvswitch hybrid network model implementation 
> >>I don’t really understand above sentence, sorry. But if we use an 
> >>extra bridge for each tab we do not have to search for the right device? 
> 
> Well, you need to test through each fwbrXXXiY sequentially to find the good 
> one. 
> (or maybe I miss something ?) could be provide a example of what of have in 
> mind ? 
Your are right (I am confused, sorry). 
> > >>3.) does not work with OVS 
> > well, for ovs + tapbridge, it's working fine now ;) 
> 
> >>Sure. But I asume it would simplify things if we use exactly the same setup. 
> 
> I agreed too ! 
> 
> something like: 
> --------------- 
> linux bridge vmbr0 
> ------------ 
> 
> vmbr0<-->vethXXXiY (+vlan)<-->fwbrXXXiY<-->tapXXXiY 
> 
> ovs bridge vmbr0 
> ---------------- 
> vmbr0<-->ovsintXXXiY (+vlan)<-->fwbrXXXiY<-->tapXXXiY 
> 
> 
> seem good ? 
Yes. Do you have some time to implement that to test performance? 
_______________________________________________ 
pve-devel mailing list 
pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com 
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel 
    
    
More information about the pve-devel
mailing list