[pve-devel] [PATCH] pve-common: PVE/Network: rework of activate_bridge_vlan

[Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG]

I don't get your idea. What do you mean? Why should there be unnecessary untag/tag operations?

Stefan

Am 28.01.2013 um 06:25 schrieb Dietmar Maurer <dietmar at proxmox.com>:

>> But setting the vlan on the bridge involve unnecessary tag/untag operations
>> which are avoided with the current setup.
>> 
>> Please can you try to set the gvrp flag of the tap device instead (after adding
>> it to the bridge). Or is that a bad idea?
> 
> Sigh - I am still wrong. There is simply no vlan tag on the tap devices. 
> So if you use a private bridge, pve does not set any VLAN tags, and thus
> GVRP will not be involved.
> 
> But this behavior looks correct to me?
>