[pve-devel] new bridge code doesn't work with redhat kernel

[Michael Rasmussen]

On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 16:13:25 +0000
Dietmar Maurer <dietmar at proxmox.com> wrote:

> >Also, I think I'm not the only to use this kind of setup, so 
> > proxmox users should be warned before doing the update.
> 
> This change also scares me, really.
Maybe I have problems understanding it all, but what is purpose of gvrp
and what problems does it solve which cannot be solved with the current
setup?

If gvrp does not solve any real problems faced in todays setup I think
it would be stupid to change things. As this thread has proved there is
no migration path for every usecase of the current network
configuration which means users will have expected downtime of service.

-- 
Hilsen/Regards
Michael Rasmussen

Get my public GnuPG keys:
michael <at> rasmussen <dot> cc
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD3C9A00E
mir <at> datanom <dot> net
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE501F51C
mir <at> miras <dot> org
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xE3E80917
--------------------------------------------------------------
Someone is speaking well of you.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/attachments/20130207/5eee3330/attachment.sig>