[pve-devel] new bridge code doesn't work with redhat kernel
Alexandre DERUMIER
aderumier at odiso.com
Wed Feb 6 16:15:32 CET 2013
>>mhm strange i was sure that i've tested it with latest proxmox kernel.
>>Will retest. Didn't redhat backport all those changes done in vanilla?
Not all new features are backported. (I think we need to wait for rhel7 to have a big jump in kernel version)
>>mean what's the correct workflow under redhat to use bond + bridge + vlan.
here the ovirt (and rhev) network setup
http://www.ovirt.org/Vdsm_Network
But it's not clear if they put vlan on bridge or on interface.
----- Mail original -----
De: "Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG" <s.priebe at profihost.ag>
À: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com>
Cc: pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
Envoyé: Mercredi 6 Février 2013 14:48:11
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] new bridge code doesn't work with redhat kernel
Hio,
mhm strange i was sure that i've tested it with latest proxmox kernel.
Will retest. Didn't redhat backport all those changes done in vanilla? I
mean what's the correct workflow under redhat to use bond + bridge + vlan.
Stefan
Am 06.02.2013 14:35, schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER:
>>> Maybe, I'll do test without bond.
>
> Doesn't work without bond too :(
>
>
> ----- Mail original -----
>
> De: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com>
> À: "Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG" <s.priebe at profihost.ag>
> Cc: pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
> Envoyé: Mercredi 6 Février 2013 14:22:08
> Objet: Re: [pve-devel] new bridge code doesn't work with redhat kernel
>
>>> Urgh... that's pretty sad. It was working fine my test. But maybe i
>>> didn't test everything. Could you desribe me how exactly you've done the
>>> test?
>
> simply start the vm with old code and new code. (I have reboot the host to be sure)
> can't ping the vm with new code.
>
> But it's work fine with kernel 3.7.
>
>
>>> I've no bond running - just plain eth => bridge. Maybe that's the
>>> important difference?
>
> Maybe, I'll do test without bond.
>
>
> It's really possible it's a kernel problem, because like I said it, a lot of work has been done in kernel around 2.6.39 on the vlan code.
>
>
> ----- Mail original -----
>
> De: "Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG" <s.priebe at profihost.ag>
> À: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com>
> Cc: "Dietmar Maurer" <dietmar at proxmox.com>, pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
> Envoyé: Mercredi 6 Février 2013 13:56:08
> Objet: Re: new bridge code doesn't work with redhat kernel
>
> Hi,
>
> Urgh... that's pretty sad. It was working fine my test. But maybe i
> didn't test everything. Could you desribe me how exactly you've done the
> test?
>
> I've no bond running - just plain eth => bridge. Maybe that's the
> important difference?
>
> Stefan
>
> Am 06.02.2013 09:47, schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER:
>> Hi,
>> I'm testing the new bridge code, and it doesn't work for me !
>>
>> setup: bridge vmbr1, on top of bond0
>> guest vm (id 115) have an interface in vlan95
>> host kernel 2.6.32-18-pve
>>
>>
>> But it's working fine with 3.7 kernel
>>
>>
>>
>> Also I notice than we update the pve-common code, the old tagged network interface remain in bridge,
>> I don't known if it's can do network loop. (bond0.95 and vmbr1.95 in same bridge in my example)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> old
>> --------------
>> #brctl show
>>
>> vmbr1 8000.001aa03c98c5 no bond0
>>
>> vmbr1v95 8000.001aa03c98c5 no bond0.95
>> tap115i0
>>
>>
>> update to last pve-common, restart the vm
>> -------------------------------------------
>> #qm stop 115
>> #qm start 115
>> #brctl show
>>
>> vmbr1 8000.001aa03c98c5 no bond0
>> vmbr1v95 8000.001aa03c98c5 no bond0.95 -->old bond0.95 always attached (don't known if it can cause network loop ?)
>> tap115i0
>> vmbr1.95
>>
>>
>> (I have also restart the server to have a clean bridge, doesn't work too)
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Mail original -----
>>
>> De: "Stefan Priebe" <s.priebe at profihost.ag>
>> À: "Dietmar Maurer" <dietmar at proxmox.com>
>> Cc: pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
>> Envoyé: Lundi 28 Janvier 2013 17:45:27
>> Objet: Re: [pve-devel] [PATCH] pve-common: PVE/Network: rework of activate_bridge_vlan
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Am 28.01.2013 12:00, schrieb Dietmar Maurer:
>>> applied, thanks!
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: pve-devel-bounces at pve.proxmox.com [mailto:pve-devel-
>>>> bounces at pve.proxmox.com] On Behalf Of Stefan Priebe
>>>> Sent: Freitag, 25. Jänner 2013 22:16
>>>> To: pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
>>>> Subject: [pve-devel] [PATCH] pve-common: PVE/Network: rework of
>>>> activate_bridge_vlan
>>>>
>>>> - use ip command instead of old vconfig
>>>> - activate gvrp by default (it doesn't harm if the switch does not support it or
>>>> it is disabled)
>>>> - use bridge instead of raw ethernet device as vlan bridge
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Priebe <s.priebe at profihost.ag>
>>>> ---
>>>> data/PVE/Network.pm | 22 ++++------------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/data/PVE/Network.pm b/data/PVE/Network.pm index
>>>> 2c356eb..71045fe 100644
>>>> --- a/data/PVE/Network.pm
>>>> +++ b/data/PVE/Network.pm
>>>> @@ -72,28 +72,14 @@ sub activate_bridge_vlan {
>>>> die "got strange vlan tag '$tag_param'\n" if $tag < 1 || $tag > 4094;
>>>>
>>>> my $bridgevlan = "${bridge}v$tag";
>>>> -
>>>> - my $dir = "/sys/class/net/$bridge/brif";
>>>> -
>>>> - #check if we have an only one ethX or bondX interface in the bridge
>>>> -
>>>> - my $iface;
>>>> - PVE::Tools::dir_glob_foreach($dir, '((eth|bond)\d+)', sub {
>>>> - my ($slave) = @_;
>>>> -
>>>> - die "more then one physical interfaces on bridge '$bridge'\n" if
>>>> $iface;
>>>> - $iface = $slave;
>>>> -
>>>> - });
>>>> -
>>>> - die "no physical interface on bridge '$bridge'\n" if !$iface;
>>>> -
>>>> + my $iface = $bridge;
>>>> my $ifacevlan = "${iface}.$tag";
>>>> + my $vlanflags = "reorder_hdr on gvrp on";
>>>>
>>>> # create vlan on $iface is not already exist
>>>> if (! -d "/sys/class/net/$ifacevlan") {
>>>> - system("/sbin/vconfig add $iface $tag") == 0 ||
>>>> - die "can't add vlan tag $tag to interface $iface\n";
>>>> + system("/sbin/ip link add link $iface name $ifacevlan type vlan id $tag
>>>> $vlanflags") == 0 ||
>>>> + die "can't add vlan tag $tag to interface $iface\n";
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> # be sure to have the $ifacevlan up
>>>> --
>>>> 1.7.10.4
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> pve-devel mailing list
>>>> pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
>>>> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pve-devel mailing list
>> pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
>> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> pve-devel mailing list
> pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
> http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
>
More information about the pve-devel
mailing list