[pve-devel] kernel 3.10 : bridge vlan test
aderumier at odiso.com
Tue Dec 17 10:04:02 CET 2013
>>What exactly are the advanced features?
- openflow (very important for me, as I have servers with more than 100vms, it's difficult to analyse traffic between vms on same bridge)
- vxlan support (linux bridge have also support recently, but I don't known if it's work)
- and for my personnal opinion, I think linux bridge have too much regression when new features are impletemed.
some bugs last year:
- multicast problems (igmp snooping bug)
- mixing tagged vlans on ethX host and tagged vlans in guest didn't work(maybe it's solved),
- gvrp support bugs (see stefan)
>>For me this is minor advantage, not worth to introduce a complete new network infrastructure.
>>But don't get me wrong - I just want to be to negative here. I just want to avoid that
>>we have to do all things twice (firewall).
Sure I understand. (I just want to add support to pve-bridge script, as I really don't need to manage firewall on proxmox side).
>>So the question is: Can we build a full featured firewall using openflow?
I think it's not yet possible, but it's on the roadmap of openstack
----- Mail original -----
De: "Dietmar Maurer" <dietmar at proxmox.com>
À: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com>
Cc: "pve-devel" <pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com>, "Stefan Priebe" <s.priebe at profihost.ag>
Envoyé: Mardi 17 Décembre 2013 09:21:28
Objet: RE: [pve-devel] kernel 3.10 : bridge vlan test
> My point is that it could be fine to give user choice (at least for advanced users,
> not everyone need advanced features of openvswitch)
What exactly are the advanced features?
More information about the pve-devel