[pve-devel] firsts cache benchs results
Alexandre DERUMIER
aderumier at odiso.com
Thu Nov 8 08:50:27 CET 2012
>>I do not really understand that.
>>
>>The qemu iscsi.c driver ignore the BDRV_O_NOCACHE flag, so how can this result in any difference?!
>>
><see qemu-kvm/block/iscsi.c
I'll redo tests to day.
for sheepdog, libiscsi, maybe BDRV_O_NOCACHE make sense, as host don't see the devices, so host can't cache.
librbd use his own cache implementation on host.( qemu writeback option, activate librbd cache = true)
I think that sheepdog have a writeback cache mecanism, but I need to read the doc.
I'll keep you in touch today with nfs results.
----- Mail original -----
De: "Dietmar Maurer" <dietmar at proxmox.com>
À: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com>, pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com
Envoyé: Mercredi 7 Novembre 2012 19:04:38
Objet: RE: [pve-devel] firsts cache benchs results
> nexenta - libiscsi:
> --------------------
> default: 4000 (some hangs)
> cache=none : 14000
> cache=writeback : 5000 (some hangs)
I do not really understand that.
The qemu iscsi.c driver ignore the BDRV_O_NOCACHE flag, so how can this result in any difference?!
see qemu-kvm/block/iscsi.c
More information about the pve-devel
mailing list