[pve-devel] firsts cache benchs results
    Alexandre DERUMIER 
    aderumier at odiso.com
       
    Thu Nov  8 08:50:27 CET 2012
    
    
  
>>I do not really understand that. 
>>
>>The qemu iscsi.c driver ignore the BDRV_O_NOCACHE flag, so how can this result in any difference?! 
>>
><see qemu-kvm/block/iscsi.c 
I'll redo tests to day.
for sheepdog, libiscsi, maybe BDRV_O_NOCACHE make sense, as host don't see the devices, so host can't cache.
librbd use his own cache implementation on host.( qemu writeback option, activate librbd cache = true)
I think that sheepdog have a writeback cache mecanism, but I need to read the doc.
I'll keep you in touch today with nfs results.
----- Mail original ----- 
De: "Dietmar Maurer" <dietmar at proxmox.com> 
À: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <aderumier at odiso.com>, pve-devel at pve.proxmox.com 
Envoyé: Mercredi 7 Novembre 2012 19:04:38 
Objet: RE: [pve-devel] firsts cache benchs results 
> nexenta - libiscsi: 
> -------------------- 
> default: 4000 (some hangs) 
> cache=none : 14000 
> cache=writeback : 5000 (some hangs) 
I do not really understand that. 
The qemu iscsi.c driver ignore the BDRV_O_NOCACHE flag, so how can this result in any difference?! 
see qemu-kvm/block/iscsi.c 
    
    
More information about the pve-devel
mailing list