[pmg-devel] [PATCH docs] pmg-planning-deployment: minor fixups in grammar and understandability

Oguz Bektas o.bektas at proxmox.com
Tue Apr 21 12:24:15 CEST 2020


maybe instead of advisable/advised it's better to just say
'recommended'?

feel free to apply either version :)


On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:10:45AM +0200, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/20/20 7:46 PM, Stoiko Ivanov wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch! LGTM
> > one question out of curiosity inline:
> > 
> > On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 16:22:56 +0200
> > Oguz Bektas <o.bektas at proxmox.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Oguz Bektas <o.bektas at proxmox.com>
> > > ---
> > >   pmg-planning-deployment.adoc | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
> > >   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/pmg-planning-deployment.adoc b/pmg-planning-deployment.adoc
> > > index 23040cc..a72995a 100644
> > > --- a/pmg-planning-deployment.adoc
> > > +++ b/pmg-planning-deployment.adoc
> > > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ the firewall and will be directly forwarded to your e-mail server.
> > >   image::images/2018_IT_infrastructure_without_Proxmox_Mail_Gateway_final_1024.png[]
> > >   By using the {pmg}, all your e-mail traffic is forwarded to the
> > > -Proxmox Mail Gateway, which filters the whole e-mail traffic and
> > > +Proxmox Mail Gateway, which filters the e-mail traffic and
> > >   removes unwanted e-mails. You can manage incoming and outgoing mail
> > >   traffic.
> > > @@ -21,13 +21,13 @@ image::images/2018_IT_infrastructure_with_Proxmox_Mail_Gateway_final_1024.png[]
> > >   Filtering outgoing e-mails
> > >   --------------------------
> > > -Many e-mail filter solutions do not scan outgoing mails. Opposed to
> > > -that {pmg} is designed to scan both incoming and outgoing
> > > -e-mails. This has two major advantages:
> > > +Many e-mail filtering solutions do not scan outgoing mails. In contrast, {pmg} is
> > > +designed to scan both incoming and outgoing e-mails. This has two major
> > > +advantages:
> > >   . {pmg} is able to detect viruses sent from an internal host. In many
> > >   countries you are liable for sending viruses to other
> > > -people. The {pmg} outgoing e-mail scanning feature is an additional
> > > +people. Outgoing e-mail scanning feature is an additional
> > >   protection to avoid that.
> > >   . {pmg} can gather statistics about outgoing e-mails too. Statistics
> > > @@ -41,17 +41,17 @@ statistics can show you this important information. A solution which
> > >   does not scan outgoing e-mail cannot do that.
> > >   To enable outgoing e-mail filtering you just need to send all outgoing
> > > -e-mails through your {png} (usually by specifying Proxmox as
> > > -"smarthost" on your e-mail server.
> > > +e-mails through your {pmg} (usually by specifying Proxmox as
> > > +"smarthost" on your e-mail server).
> > >   [[firewall_settings]]
> > >   Firewall settings
> > >   -----------------
> > > -In order to pass e-mail traffic to the {pmg} you need to allow traffic
> > > -on the SMTP the port. Our servers use the Network Time Protocol (NTP)
> > > -for time synchronization, RAZOR, DNS, SSH, HTTP and port 8006 for the web
> > > -based management interface.
> > > +In order to pass e-mail traffic to the {pmg} you need to allow traffic on the
> > > +SMTP port. Our software uses the Network Time Protocol (NTP) for time
> > > +synchronization, RAZOR, DNS, SSH, HTTP and port 8006 for the web-based
> > > +management interface.
> > >   [options="header"]
> > >   |======
> > > @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ based management interface.
> > >   |GUI/API |8006    |TCP      |Intranet   |Proxmox
> > >   |======
> > > -CAUTION: It is advisable to restrict access to the GUI/API port as far
> > > +CAUTION: It is advised to restrict access to the GUI/API port as far
> > >   as possible.
> > from my (far from well-informed) feeling I would tend towards 'advisable'
> > instead of 'advised' - quick search:
> > https://www.englishforums.com/English/ItIsAdvisedTo/bvcqxq/post.htm
> > https://forum.wordreference.com/threads/advisable-or-advised.3485818/
> > Is advised the better choice here?
> > 
> > apart from and with that (both uses should be correct):
> > Reviewed-By: Stoiko Ivanov <s.ivanov at proxmox.com>
> > 
> 
> I guess it depends, do we recommend doing it, but not doing it is also okay,
> then advisable seems to be the right choice.
> If we really recommend it and one should not skip doing this, then I would
> go for advised.
> 
> > 
> > >   The outgoing HTTP connection is mainly used by virus pattern updates,
> > > @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ System Requirements
> > >   -------------------
> > >   The {pmg} can run on dedicated server hardware or inside a virtual machine on
> > > -any of the following plattforms:
> > > +any of the following platforms:
> > >   * Proxmox VE (KVM)
> > > @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ any of the following plattforms:
> > >   * KVM (virtio drivers are integrated, great performance)
> > > -* Virtual box™
> > > +* VirtualBox™
> > >   * Citrix Hypervisor™ (former XenServer™)
> > > @@ -150,5 +150,5 @@ To use the web interface you need a modern browser, this includes:
> > >   * Firefox, a release from the current year, or the latest Extended
> > >   Support Release
> > >   * Chrome, a release from the current year
> > > -* Microsofts currently supported version of Edge
> > > +* Microsoft's currently supported version of Edge
> > >   * Safari, a release from the current year
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > pmg-devel mailing list
> > pmg-devel at pve.proxmox.com
> > https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pmg-devel mailing list
> pmg-devel at pve.proxmox.com
> https://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pmg-devel
> 



More information about the pmg-devel mailing list