[pdm-devel] [PATCH datacenter-manager v2 1/3] fix #6901: api: add explicit permission check for controllers list
Lukas Wagner
l.wagner at proxmox.com
Mon Nov 3 14:40:28 CET 2025
Hi Shan, thanks a lot for the patch!
One comment inline, apart from that it looks good to me.
On Fri Oct 17, 2025 at 3:02 PM CEST, Shan Shaji wrote:
> When a non-root user tried to access the EVPN section, the API was
> throwing "403: permission check failed" error. To fix this, add
> explicit permission check for the `/controller` endpoint.
>
> Now every authenticated user can access the endpoint however, the user
> needs to have at least `Resource.Audit` permission under `/resource`.
> Only the controllers from remotes which the user has `Resource.Audit`
> privilege on `/remote/{remote_name}` will be included in the returned
> list.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shan Shaji <s.shaji at proxmox.com>
> ---
> server/src/api/sdn/controllers.rs | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/server/src/api/sdn/controllers.rs b/server/src/api/sdn/controllers.rs
> index 271397a..649d668 100644
> --- a/server/src/api/sdn/controllers.rs
> +++ b/server/src/api/sdn/controllers.rs
> @@ -1,10 +1,11 @@
> use std::collections::HashSet;
>
> -use anyhow::Error;
> +use anyhow::{format_err, Error};
>
> use pbs_api_types::REMOTE_ID_SCHEMA;
> -use pdm_api_types::{remotes::RemoteType, sdn::ListController};
> -use proxmox_router::Router;
> +use pdm_api_types::{remotes::RemoteType, sdn::ListController, Authid, PRIV_RESOURCE_AUDIT};
> +use proxmox_access_control::CachedUserInfo;
> +use proxmox_router::{http_bail, Permission, Router, RpcEnvironment};
> use proxmox_schema::api;
> use pve_api_types::ListControllersType;
>
> @@ -49,6 +50,12 @@ pub const ROUTER: Router = Router::new().get(&API_METHOD_LIST_CONTROLLERS);
> type: ListController,
> },
> },
> + access: {
> + permission: &Permission::Anybody,
> + description: "The user needs to have at least the `Resource.Audit` privilege under `/resource`.
> + Only controllers from remotes for which the user has `Resource.Audit` on `/remote/{remote_name}`
I think there is a typo here, as far as I can tell the ACL path should
be /resource/{remote_name}? Also applies to the other two patches.
> + will be included in the returned list."
> + }
> )]
> /// Query controllers of remotes with optional filtering options
> pub async fn list_controllers(
> @@ -56,10 +63,25 @@ pub async fn list_controllers(
> running: Option<bool>,
> ty: Option<ListControllersType>,
> remotes: Option<HashSet<String>>,
> + rpcenv: &mut dyn RpcEnvironment,
> ) -> Result<Vec<ListController>, Error> {
> + let user_info = CachedUserInfo::new()?;
> +
> + let auth_id: Authid = rpcenv
> + .get_auth_id()
> + .ok_or_else(|| format_err!("no authid available"))?
> + .parse()?;
> +
> + if !user_info.any_privs_below(&auth_id, &["resource"], PRIV_RESOURCE_AUDIT)? {
> + http_bail!(FORBIDDEN, "user has no access to resources");
> + }
> +
> let (remote_config, _) = pdm_config::remotes::config()?;
> + let authorized_remotes = remote_config.into_iter().filter(|(remote_name, _)| {
> + user_info.lookup_privs(&auth_id, &["resource", &remote_name]) & PRIV_RESOURCE_AUDIT != 0
> + });
>
> - let filtered_remotes = remote_config.into_iter().filter_map(|(_, remote)| {
> + let filtered_remotes = authorized_remotes.filter_map(|(_, remote)| {
> if remote.ty == RemoteType::Pve
> && remotes
> .as_ref()
More information about the pdm-devel
mailing list