[pdm-devel] [PATCH datacenter-manager v2 3/4] api: add /remotes/tasks/refresh

[Lukas Wagner]

On Fri Dec 19, 2025 at 2:52 PM CET, Shannon Sterz wrote:
> some comments in-line:
>
> On Thu Dec 18, 2025 at 3:20 PM CET, Lukas Wagner wrote:
[...]
>>  #[api(
>> @@ -168,3 +175,80 @@ async fn task_statistics(
>>
>>      Ok(TaskStatistics { by_type, by_remote })
>>  }
>> +
>> +#[api(
>> +    input: {
>> +        properties: {
>> +            remote: {
>> +                schema: REMOTE_ID_SCHEMA,
>> +                optional: true,
>
> i wonder if it makes sense to allow a list of remotes here instead of
> just a single remote.

Yeah, good point. I don't see any reason why not, especially since the
refresh_taskcache function supports a list of remotes anyway.

As for permissions, I will implement it so that if `remotes` is
provided, the user requires the appropriate permissions for *all* off
them - opposed to just not showing them as we do for `remotes` is not
provided.

I will change this to a `remotes` parameter for v2.

Thanks a lot, Shannon!

>
> this api endpoint would also benefit from a short description on how
> this parameter influences the result imo.
>

Will do!

>> +            },
>> +        },
>> +    },
>> +    access: {
>> +        permission: &Permission::Anybody,
>> +        description: "Resource.Modify privileges are needed on /resource/{remote}",
>> +    },
>> +    returns: { type: UPID }
>> +)]
>> +/// Refresh the update summary of all remotes.
>> +pub fn refresh_remote_tasks(
>> +    remote: Option<String>,
>> +    rpcenv: &mut dyn RpcEnvironment,
>> +) -> Result<UPID, Error> {
>> +    let (config, _digest) = pdm_config::remotes::config()?;
>> +
>> +    let auth_id: Authid = rpcenv.get_auth_id().unwrap().parse()?;
>> +    let user_info = CachedUserInfo::new()?;

[...]