[pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v5 3/5] acme: drop local AcmeClient

[Samuel Rufinatscha]

On 1/14/26 10:57 AM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> On January 14, 2026 9:56 am, Samuel Rufinatscha wrote:
>> On 1/13/26 2:44 PM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
>>> On January 8, 2026 12:26 pm, Samuel Rufinatscha wrote:
>>>> PBS currently uses its own ACME client and API logic, while PDM uses the
>>>> factored out proxmox-acme and proxmox-acme-api crates. This duplication
>>>> risks differences in behaviour and requires ACME maintenance in two
>>>> places. This patch is part of a series to move PBS over to the shared
>>>> ACME stack.
>>>>
>>>> Changes:
>>>> - Remove the local src/acme/client.rs and switch to
>>>> proxmox_acme::async_client::AcmeClient where needed.
>>>> - Use proxmox_acme_api::load_client_with_account to the custom
>>>> AcmeClient::load() function
>>>> - Replace the local do_register() logic with
>>>> proxmox_acme_api::register_account, to further ensure accounts are persisted
>>>> - Replace the local AcmeAccountName type, required for
>>>> proxmox_acme_api::register_account
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Samuel Rufinatscha <s.rufinatscha at proxmox.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    src/acme/client.rs                     | 691 -------------------------
>>>>    src/acme/mod.rs                        |   3 -
>>>>    src/acme/plugin.rs                     |   2 +-
>>>>    src/api2/config/acme.rs                |  50 +-
>>>>    src/api2/node/certificates.rs          |   2 +-
>>>>    src/api2/types/acme.rs                 |   8 -
>>>>    src/bin/proxmox_backup_manager/acme.rs |  17 +-
>>>>    src/config/acme/mod.rs                 |   8 +-
>>>>    src/config/node.rs                     |   9 +-
>>>>    9 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 754 deletions(-)
>>>>    delete mode 100644 src/acme/client.rs
>>>>
>>>
>>> [..]
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/src/config/acme/mod.rs b/src/config/acme/mod.rs
>>>> index ac89ae5e..e4639c53 100644
>>>> --- a/src/config/acme/mod.rs
>>>> +++ b/src/config/acme/mod.rs
>>>
>>> I think this whole file should probably be replaced entirely by
>>> proxmox-acme-api , which - AFAICT - would just require adding the
>>> completion helpers there?
>>>
>>
>> Good point, yes I think moving the completion helpers would
>> allow us to get rid of this file. PDM does not make use of
>> them / there is atm no 1:1 code in proxmox/ for these helpers.
> 
> only because https://bugzilla.proxmox.com/show_bug.cgi?id=7179 is not
> yet implemented ;) so please coordinate with Shan to avoid doing the
> work twice.

Ah, good catch! thanks for the reference @Fabian.

@Shan: since #7179 will likely touch the same area, it probably makes
sense to factor out the required helpers as part of this series
to avoid duplicate work. If that works for you, maybe hold off on
parallel changes here until this lands. What do you think?