[pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v3] etc: raise nofile soft limit to hard limit for proxmox-backup-proxy

[Thomas Lamprecht]

Am 20.11.25 um 15:32 schrieb Christian Ebner:
> This is acceptable since PBS does not directly depend on problematic
> select() calls as verified via `nm` and does not use it in linked
> libraries to the best of my knowledge.
> 

Isn't above and 

> Occurrences of the symbol according to `nm -D <shared-object>` are:
> 
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.7.0
>                  U select at GLIBC_2.2.5
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpam.so.0
>                  U select at GLIBC_2.2.5
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
> 000000000010e140 W select@@GLIBC_2.2.5
> /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcrypto.so.3
>                  U select at GLIBC_2.2.5

above a contradiction? Or do I just misinterpret this?
As it would seem to me that the usage of select symbols would in fact
show that this might not be safe, or?

If the API calls into any function of those libs, that might might then create
a FD >= 1024 inside which then could get passed down to any of their select
calls?