[pbs-devel] applied-series: [PATCH proxmox-backup v3 00/10] notifications: cleanup in preparation of overridable templates
Lukas Wagner
l.wagner at proxmox.com
Wed Apr 2 15:27:16 CEST 2025
On 2025-04-02 14:45, Thomas Lamprecht wrote:
> Am 28.03.25 um 11:22 schrieb Lukas Wagner:> When the notification system was brought to PBS, the template strings
>> were moved to the template files as they were, without any changes.
>> The original templates were an implementation detail which were not
>> exposed to the user in any way.
>> They were bit inconsistent with regards to how template variables were
>> named (e.g. '{{datastore}}', '{{store}}', '{{job.store}}' for
>> referring to a datastore), as well es how variables/helpers
>> were accessed ({{ var }} vs {{var}}).
>>
>> With [#6143] on the horizon, notification templates, template variables
>> and template helpers become part of our public API and as such
>> we should provide some stability guarantees for them.
>
> Series seems alright to me, I'm just wondering a bit how that guarantee
> will look like? But probably better part of the series that is actually
> implementing [#6143].
I would suggest:
- no backward-incompatible changes in minor upgrades
- for breaking changes in major upgrades, implement some best-effort
checks in pbsXtoY/pveXtoY which check any custom templates for
anything that will be changed/removed
Incompatible changes are:
- removing variables
- changing type/representation of variables (e.g. switching from number of bytes to KiB, etc.)
- removing helpers
- non-trivial changes to a helper's behavior
- incompatible changes to the rendering engine (e.g. switching from Handlebars to something else)
Backward-compatible changes would be:
- adding new template variables
- adding new template helpers
- adding new, optional parameters to existing helpers
- trivial changes to helpers (hypothetical example: "1KiB" -> "1 KiB" for `{{ human-bytes 1024 }}`)
What do you think?
--
- Lukas
More information about the pbs-devel
mailing list