[pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v2 2/2] pbs2to3: add test cases for kernel version compatibility
Maximiliano Sandoval
m.sandoval at proxmox.com
Mon Aug 26 14:28:40 CEST 2024
Daniel Kral <d.kral at proxmox.com> writes:
Some small nits commented bellow.
> Implements test cases for the kernel version compatibility check in
> `pbs2to3` for a set of expected and unexpected kernel versions. They are
> tested for both cases, when PBS was already upgraded to v3.x and when it
> is still on v2.x.
>
> The kernel versions in the test cases were mostly hand-picked from the
> current Proxmox Backup Server repositories, excluding the kernel
> versions 5.19.* and 6.1.* because they were both not expected before
> this patch. I also added a fictional kernel version 7.1.0 as an
> unexpected case to make sure that the initial objective of only allowing
> arbitrary kernel versions above 6.2.* were marked as expected.
>
> Suggested-by: Maximiliano Sandoval <m.sandoval at proxmox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Kral <d.kral at proxmox.com>
> ---
> src/bin/pbs2to3.rs | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/bin/pbs2to3.rs b/src/bin/pbs2to3.rs
> index 194a077e..2f6a8dcc 100644
> --- a/src/bin/pbs2to3.rs
> +++ b/src/bin/pbs2to3.rs
> @@ -123,18 +123,26 @@ impl Checker {
> Ok(())
> }
>
> + fn is_kernel_version_compatible(&self, running_version: &str) -> bool {
> + let re = if self.upgraded {
> + r"^6\.(?:2\.(?:[2-9]\d+|1[6-8]|1\d\d+)|([5-9]|\d{2,}))[^~]*$"
> + } else {
> + r"^(?:5\.(?:13|15)|6\.2)"
> + };
> + let re = Regex::new(re).expect("failed to compile kernel compat regex");
> +
> + re.is_match(running_version)
> + }
> +
> fn check_kernel_compat(
> &mut self,
> pkg_versions: &[pbs_api_types::APTUpdateInfo],
> ) -> Result<(), Error> {
> self.output.log_info("Check running kernel version..")?;
> - let (krunning, kinstalled) = if self.upgraded {
> - (
> - Regex::new(r"^6\.(?:2\.(?:[2-9]\d+|1[6-8]|1\d\d+)|([5-9]|\d{2,}))[^~]*$")?,
> - "proxmox-kernel-6.2",
> - )
> + let kinstalled = if self.upgraded {
> + "proxmox-kernel-6.2"
> } else {
> - (Regex::new(r"^(?:5\.(?:13|15)|6\.2)")?, "pve-kernel-5.15")
> + "pve-kernel-5.15"
> };
>
> let output = std::process::Command::new("uname").arg("-r").output();
> @@ -144,7 +152,7 @@ impl Checker {
> .log_fail("unable to determine running kernel version.")?,
> Ok(ret) => {
> let running_version = std::str::from_utf8(&ret.stdout[..ret.stdout.len() - 1])?;
> - if krunning.is_match(running_version) {
> + if self.is_kernel_version_compatible(running_version) {
> if self.upgraded {
> self.output.log_pass(format!(
> "running new kernel '{running_version}' after upgrade."
> @@ -620,3 +628,42 @@ impl ConsoleOutput {
> Ok(())
> }
> }
> +
> +#[cfg(test)]
> +mod tests {
> + use super::*;
> +
> + fn test_is_kernel_version_compatible(
> + expected_versions: &[&str],
> + unexpected_versions: &[&str],
> + upgraded: bool,
> + ) {
> + let checker = Checker {
> + output: ConsoleOutput::new(),
> + upgraded,
> + };
> +
> + for version in expected_versions {
> + assert!(checker.is_kernel_version_compatible(version));
> + }
> + for version in unexpected_versions.iter() {
The `iter()` should not be necessary here.
> + assert!(!checker.is_kernel_version_compatible(version));
> + }
> + }
> +
> + #[test]
> + fn test_is_pve_kernel_version_compatible() {
> + let expected_versions = vec!["5.13.19-6-pve", "5.15.158-2-pve", "6.2.16-5-pve"];
> + let unexpected_versions = vec!["6.1.10-1-pve", "5.19.17-2-pve"];
Both of these could be slices instead of `vec!`.
> +
> + test_is_kernel_version_compatible(&expected_versions, &unexpected_versions, false);
Which also would entail removing the `&`s here.
> + }
> +
> + #[test]
> + fn test_is_proxmox_kernel_version_compatible() {
> + let expected_versions = vec!["6.2.16-20-pve", "6.5.13-6-pve", "6.8.12-1-pve"];
> + let unexpected_versions = vec!["5.13.19-6-pve", "6.1.15-1-pve", "7.1.0-1-pve"];
Ditto
> +
> + test_is_kernel_version_compatible(&expected_versions, &unexpected_versions, true);
> + }
> +}
--
Maximiliano
More information about the pbs-devel
mailing list