[pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup] client: catalog shell: avoid navigating below archive root
Fabian Grünbichler
f.gruenbichler at proxmox.com
Wed Aug 7 10:25:17 CEST 2024
Quoting Christian Ebner (2024-07-22 12:07:05)
> Avoid to underflow the catalogs shell position stack by navigating
> below the archives root directory into the catalog root. Otherwise
> the shell will panic, as the root entry is always expected to be
> present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Ebner <c.ebner at proxmox.com>
> ---
> Encountered while implementing the catalog shell for the split pxar
> archive case.
>
> Without this additional check, a `cd ..` in the pxar archive root of
> the catalog shell will panic.
>
> pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs b/pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs
> index 349bb7cbc..88045db5d 100644
> --- a/pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs
> +++ b/pbs-client/src/catalog_shell.rs
> @@ -720,6 +720,12 @@ impl Shell {
> &mut None,
> )
> .await?;
> +
> + if new_position.len() < 1 {
> + // Avoid moving below archive root into catalog root
> + return Ok(());
> + }
since new_position is a Vec, wouldn't `new_position.is_empty()` be the right
fit?
should this print a warning? I guess since regular shells pretend `/` is the
parent of `/`, we can do the same here?
> +
> if !new_position.last().unwrap().catalog.is_directory() {
> bail!("not a directory");
> }
> --
> 2.39.2
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pbs-devel mailing list
> pbs-devel at lists.proxmox.com
> https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pbs-devel
>
>
More information about the pbs-devel
mailing list