[pbs-devel] [PATCH v4 proxmox-backup 2/3] node: status: added bootmode

[Gabriel Goller]

On 11/27/23 14:53, Wolfgang Bumiller wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 02:28:14PM +0100, Gabriel Goller wrote:
>> Thanks for the review!
>>
>> On 11/27/23 14:10, Wolfgang Bumiller wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 11:52:37AM +0100, Gabriel Goller wrote:
>>>> +
>>>> +#[api]
>>>> +#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Default)]
>>> And Clone + Copy
>> Agree
>>>> +#[serde(rename_all = "kebab-case")]
>>>> +/// The possible BootModes
>>>> +pub enum BootMode {
>>>> +    /// The BootMode is EFI/UEFI
>>>> +    Efi,
>>>> +    /// The BootMode is Legacy BIOS
>>>> +    #[default]
>>> ^ do we *need* Default on this type? And why is Bios the default?
>> Removed it. Was enabled on the `NodeStatus` struct and cascaded down, but
>> afaik we can remove it
>> on the `NodeStatus` struct as well and get rid of it.
> IMO this is one of those options where we can't have a default, so if a
> struct containing it needs to be Default, this value should be an
> Option<> in there instead.
Agree.

But what do you think about the SecureBoot enum in the proxmox_sys crate?
Currently I have this:

#[derive(Clone, Copy)]
pub enum SecureBoot {
     /// SecureBoot is enabled
     Enabled,
     /// SecureBoot is disabled
     Disabled,
}
impl SecureBoot {
     pub fn query() -> SecureBoot {
         lazy_static::lazy_static!(
             static ref SECURE_BOOT: Mutex<Option<SecureBoot>> = 
Mutex::new(None);
         );

         let mut last = SECURE_BOOT.lock().unwrap();
         let value = last.or_else(|| {
             // Check if SecureBoot is enabled
             // Attention: this file is not seekable!
             // Spec: 
https://uefi.org/specs/UEFI/2.10/03_Boot_Manager.html?highlight=8be4d#globally-defined-variables
             let efivar = std::fs::File::open(
"/sys/firmware/efi/efivars/SecureBoot-8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c",
             );
             if let Ok(mut file) = efivar {
                 let mut buf = [0; 5];
                 let Ok(_) = file.read_exact(&mut buf) else {
                         return Some(SecureBoot::Disabled);
                     };
                 if buf[4] == 1 {
                     Some(SecureBoot::Enabled)
                 } else {
                     Some(SecureBoot::Disabled)
                 }
             } else {
                 Some(SecureBoot::Disabled)
             }
         });
         *last = value;
         value.unwrap()
     }
}

Although we could make the function return a bool (then we'd have a 
free-standing function again), which would be simpler... (+ we convert 
it in pbs to a bool anyway)
One advantage of my approach is that we are more flexible, could add 
another option, rename them, etc...