[pbs-devel] [PATCH proxmox-backup v5 4/4] tests: check if include/exclude behavior works correctly

[Philipp Hufnagl]

This checks if including and excluding works as expected. That the
filter are added out of order is on purpose since it sould make no
difference.

Signed-off-by: Philipp Hufnagl <p.hufnagl at proxmox.com>
---
 tests/sync_jobs.rs | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tests/sync_jobs.rs

diff --git a/tests/sync_jobs.rs b/tests/sync_jobs.rs
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..83877160
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/sync_jobs.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+use pbs_api_types::{
+    apply_filters, split_by_include_exclude, BackupGroup, BackupType, GroupFilter,
+};
+use std::str::FromStr;
+
+#[test]
+fn test_group_filters() {
+    let group_filters = vec![
+        GroupFilter::from_str("exclude:regex:.*10[1-3]").unwrap(),
+        GroupFilter::from_str("regex:.*10[2-8]").unwrap(),
+        GroupFilter::from_str("exclude:regex:.*10[5-7]").unwrap(),
+    ];
+    let (include_filters, exclude_filters) = split_by_include_exclude(Some(group_filters));
+
+    let dont_backup = vec![
+        "vm/101", "vm/102", "vm/103", "vm/105", "vm/106", "vm/107", "vm/109",
+    ];
+    for id in dont_backup {
+        assert!(!apply_filters(
+            &BackupGroup::new(BackupType::Vm, id),
+            &include_filters,
+            &exclude_filters
+        ));
+    }
+
+    let do_backup = vec!["vm/104", "vm/108"];
+    for id in do_backup {
+        assert!(apply_filters(
+            &BackupGroup::new(BackupType::Vm, id),
+            &include_filters,
+            &exclude_filters
+        ));
+    }
+}
-- 
2.39.2