<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2014-07-23, 2:17 PM, Tim Nelson
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:31495223.231014.1406143078930.JavaMail.root@rockbochs.com"
type="cite">
<style type="text/css">p { margin: 0; }</style>
<div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif;
font-size: 12pt; color: #000000">Greetings-<br>
<br>
I recently experienced an odd issue where, due to failure of an
NFS host handling backups for a Proxmox cluster, several nodes
stopped responding properly. They appear as offline in the web
interface, and I/O is very slow, even to non-NFS destinations.<br>
<br>
Is this a known issue where a stale or timed out NFS mount will
cause the system to misbehave quite poorly? Would an alternate
network storage protocol such as iSCSI perform better in that
scenario?<br>
<br>
--Tim<br>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
pve-user mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:pve-user@pve.proxmox.com">pve-user@pve.proxmox.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user">http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
If you restart pve-statd, the nodes on the web page will come back.
I haven't noticed any slowdowns when I lose an NFS link though.<br>
<br>
Gerald<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Gerald Brandt
Majentis Technologies
204-229-6595
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:gbr@majentis.com">gbr@majentis.com</a></pre>
</body>
</html>