<HTML>
When the devs say they don't support it, my understanding is that it is still theoretically possible, just that they do not support it. There have been numerous and lengthy discussions on the forums about it. AFAIK there is no reason why you can't use it (beyond those the devs have discussed at length on the forums), and as such you won't get any official ProxmoxVE support. AFAIK there's no reason why you couldn't ask for help on the forums...<BR>
<BR>
<span style="font-weight: bold;">On Mon Oct 25 21:14 , Giovanni Toraldo <me@gionn.net> sent:<BR>
<BR>
</me@gionn.net></span><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(245, 245, 245); margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px; padding-left: 5px; padding-right: 0px;">2010/10/25 Andraz Sraka <<a href="javascript:top.opencompose('a@aufbix.org','','','')">a@aufbix.org</a>>:<BR>
> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:30 +0800, Jeremy Davis wrote:<BR>
>> Since forever: <a href="parse.pl?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fpve.proxmox.com%2Fwiki%2FSoftware_RAID" target="_blank"><span style="color: red;">http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Software_RAID</span></a><BR>
><BR>
> "We do not support Software RAID (mdraid) in offical Proxmox kernel."<BR>
><BR>
> Meaning MD modules are not included at all?<BR>
<BR>
No, they are available.<BR>
<BR>
fs:~# lsmod|grep md<BR>
md_mod 73648 4 raid1<BR>
fs:~# cat /proc/mdstat<BR>
Personalities : [raid1]<BR>
md2 : active raid1 sda3[0] sdb3[1]<BR>
478327232 blocks [2/2] [UU]<BR>
<BR>
md1 : active raid1 sda2[0] sdb2[1]<BR>
9767424 blocks [2/2] [UU]<BR>
<BR>
md0 : active raid1 sda1[0] sdb1[1]<BR>
289024 blocks [2/2] [UU]<BR>
<BR>
unused devices: <none><BR>
fs:~# uname -a<BR>
Linux fs 2.6.32-4-pve #1 SMP Fri Oct 15 09:47:24 CEST 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux<BR>
<BR>
Bye.<BR>
<BR>
-- <BR>
Giovanni Toraldo<BR>
<a href="parse.pl?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fgionn.net%2F" target="_blank"><span style="color: red;">http://gionn.net/</span></a><BR>
)<BR>
</none></blockquote></HTML>
<BR>