<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Tony Zakula <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tony@zakula.com">tony@zakula.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Giovanni Toraldo <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:scurippio@gmail.com" target="_blank">scurippio@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">
Il 25/07/2010 09:49, Dietmar Maurer ha scritto:<br>
<div>>> auto vmbr0<br>
>> iface vmbr0 inet static<br>
>> address 192.168.1.100<br>
>> netmask 255.255.255.0<br>
><br>
> You can't use the same network here! This results in serious routing problems.<br></div></div></blockquote></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Strange, I will take your word for it, but the machine has been running for a few days now without problems. The KVM and VZ containers have an ip address in the same network segment.</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im"><div>
><br>
><br>
>> bridge_ports none<br>
<br>
</div>Add eth0 to bridge_ports and leave unconfigured eth0<br>
(<a href="http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Network_Model#Default_Configuration_.28bridged.29" target="_blank">http://pve.proxmox.com/wiki/Network_Model#Default_Configuration_.28bridged.29</a>)<br>
<div><div></div><div><br>
>> bridge_stp off<br>
>> bridge_fd 0<br>
>> post-up echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward<br><font color="#888888"><font color="#000000"><br></font></font></div></div></div><font color="#888888">
<br><font color="#000000">Thanks, I will try it out.<br></font></font></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Tony Z </div></div><br>
</blockquote></div><br>