<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Andrew Niemantsverdriet <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:andrew@rocky.edu">andrew@rocky.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Dietmar,<br>
<br>
I am not sure what AoE is? Could you explain?<br>
<br>
And 4 NIC's bonded gives 4 times the bandwidth as well as fault<br>
tolerance. Which is really good for some of our servers. It makes<br>
migrating servers a little easier because it adds a little abstraction<br>
to the network layer. Now I have each interface as a separate bridge<br>
to keep some of our high bandwidth severs happy. When having to<br>
migrate them it is really hard to keep track of which server is using<br>
what bridge so that two high bandwidth servers don't have to share a<br>
link causing slow downs for the users. I was hoping to try and use a<br>
bond interface to eliminate that issue.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
_<br>
/-\ ndrew<br>
<div class="im"><br>
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Dietmar Maurer<<a href="mailto:dietmar@proxmox.com">dietmar@proxmox.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Do you use AoE?<br>
><br>
><br>
> Besides, I do not think it makes sense to use 4 nics in one bond.<br>
><br>
>> -----Original Message-----<br>
>> From: <a href="mailto:pve-user-bounces@pve.proxmox.com">pve-user-bounces@pve.proxmox.com</a> [mailto:<a href="mailto:pve-user-">pve-user-</a><br>
>> <a href="mailto:bounces@pve.proxmox.com">bounces@pve.proxmox.com</a>] On Behalf Of Andrew Niemantsverdriet<br>
>> Sent: Donnerstag, 11. Juni 2009 21:20<br>
>> To: proxmoxve<br>
>> Subject: [PVE-User] bond0 Issues<br>
>><br>
>> I have setup a bond0 interface containing eth0 eth1 eth2 eth3. I setup<br>
>> the bond interface with balance-rr and then set vmbr0 to contain<br>
>> bond0. When I rebooted the machine for the change to take effect I saw<br>
>> this scroll across the console:<br>
>><br>
>> bond0 received packet with own address as source address<br>
>><br>
>> It also caused the network to be very unstable with 70% packet loss.<br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div>--<br>
<div class="im"> _<br>
/-\ ndrew Niemantsverdriet<br>
Academic Computing<br>
(406) 238-7360<br>
Rocky Mountain College<br>
1511 Poly Dr.<br>
Billings MT, 59102<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">pve-user mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:pve-user@pve.proxmox.com">pve-user@pve.proxmox.com</a><br>
<a href="http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user" target="_blank">http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-user</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATA_over_Ethernet">AoE</a><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>"It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion."<br><br>"Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente servidas"<br>