<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>No it isn't. <a href="http://zfsonlinux.org">zfsonlinux.org</a> is stable and useable. I haven't any speed testing.</div><div><br></div><div>Stefan</div><div><br>Am 20.05.2013 um 12:00 schrieb Michael Rasmussen <<a href="mailto:mir@datanom.net">mir@datanom.net</a>>:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>The problem with zfs on linux is that it is fuse based mening big cpu overhead and bad io performance.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Martin Maurer <<a href="mailto:martin@proxmox.com">martin@proxmox.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; word-wrap:break-word; font-family: sans-serif; margin-top: 0px">> > btrfs is not stable and is not recommended for use in production.<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;">AFAIK btrfs is not even feature complete yet.</blockquote><br>and it's horrible unstable... i was running into 4 bugs (using 3.8 and<br>3.9 kernel) while testing it for just 2 weeks.<br><br>Stefan</blockquote><br>Yes, not the best news. How about stability of ZFS on Linux - did you also test this the same way?<br><br>Martin<br><br><br>!DSPAM:5199d3d0276994396310833!<br><br><br></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</div></blockquote></body></html>