[pve-devel] [PATCH manager v5 08/16] api: notification: add API for getting known metadata fields/values

Fiona Ebner f.ebner at proxmox.com
Fri Apr 19 14:59:07 CEST 2024


Am 15.04.24 um 10:26 schrieb Lukas Wagner:
> This new API route returns known notification metadata fields and
> a list of known possible values. This will be used by the UI to
> provide suggestions when adding/modifying match rules.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Wagner <l.wagner at proxmox.com>
> ---
>  PVE/API2/Cluster/Notifications.pm | 152 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 152 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/PVE/API2/Cluster/Notifications.pm b/PVE/API2/Cluster/Notifications.pm
> index 68fdda2a..16548bec 100644
> --- a/PVE/API2/Cluster/Notifications.pm
> +++ b/PVE/API2/Cluster/Notifications.pm
> @@ -79,12 +79,164 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({
>  	    { name => 'endpoints' },
>  	    { name => 'matchers' },
>  	    { name => 'targets' },
> +	    { name => 'fields' },

matcher-fields ?

> +	    { name => 'values' },

(matcher-)field-values ?

>  	];
>  
>  	return $result;
>      }
>  });
>  
> +__PACKAGE__->register_method ({
> +    name => 'get_fields',
> +    path => 'fields',
> +    method => 'GET',
> +    description => 'Returns known notification metadata fields and their known values',

It does not return their values.

> +    permissions => {
> +	check => ['or',
> +	    ['perm', '/mapping/notifications', ['Mapping.Modify']],
> +	    ['perm', '/mapping/notifications', ['Mapping.Audit']],
> +	],
> +    },
> +    protected => 1,

No need for protected when all it's doing is returning static info.
(This would have the privileged pvedaemon execute the request).

> +    parameters => {
> +	additionalProperties => 0,
> +	properties => {},
> +    },
> +    returns => {
> +	type => 'array',
> +	items => {
> +	    type => 'object',
> +	    properties => {
> +		name => {
> +		    description => 'Name of the field.',
> +		    type => 'string',
> +		},
> +	    },
> +	},
> +	links => [ { rel => 'child', href => '{name}' } ],
> +    },
> +    code => sub {
> +	# TODO: Adapt this API handler once we have a 'notification registry'
> +
> +	my $result = [
> +	    { name => 'type' },
> +	    { name => 'hostname' },
> +	    { name => 'backup-job' },
> +	    { name => 'replication-job' },
> +	];
> +
> +	return $result;
> +    }
> +});
> +
> +__PACKAGE__->register_method ({
> +    name => 'get_field_values',
> +    path => 'values',
> +    method => 'GET',
> +    description => 'Returns known notification metadata fields and their known values',
> +    permissions => {
> +	check => ['or',
> +	    ['perm', '/mapping/notifications', ['Mapping.Modify']],
> +	    ['perm', '/mapping/notifications', ['Mapping.Audit']],
> +	],
> +    },
> +    protected => 1,
> +    parameters => {
> +	additionalProperties => 0,
> +    },
> +    returns => {
> +	type => 'array',
> +	items => {
> +	    type => 'object',
> +	    properties => {
> +		'value' => {
> +		    description => 'Notification metadata value known by the system.',
> +		    type => 'string'
> +		},
> +		'comment' => {
> +		    description => 'Additional comment for this value.',
> +		    type => 'string',
> +		    optional => 1,
> +		},
> +		'field' => {
> +		    description => 'Field this value belongs to.',
> +		    type => 'string',
> +		    optional => 1,

Why is the field optional? All values are associated to a field below.

> +		},
> +		'internal' => {
> +		    description => 'Set if "value" was generated by the system and can'
> +		       . ' safely be used as base for translations.',
> +		    type => 'boolean',
> +		    optional => 1,
> +		},

Hmm, not sure about this one. It's only used for the type field right?
Can't we just handle that specially in the UI?




More information about the pve-devel mailing list